LessWrong7h agoenergy 110

Lightcone Commons: what I funded and why

I am an evaluator for Lightcone Commons (LC). LC is a platform for applicants to submit projects, for evaluators to rank them and for funders to choose the funding orders of several evaluators. It is not a foundation, in that it doesn’t have money that it spends how it chooses. And I do not have a permanent position working for Lightcone Commons. I get paid 2% of any money that a funder chooses to direct via my funding order. This pays for my time and also for any research that I pay others to do. That said, what were my general and specific funding preferences? This is a version of what Lightcone published, it might be wrong, but theirs was definitely wrong (their headline numbers didn’t include funding that had been hidden) Lightcone also has a beautiful page for looking through public information here . General preferences: I like AI policy that creates the ability to slow down AI if necessary, but doesn’t automatically push for immediate pauses. I like policy orgs which people I know in US politics respect. My current understanding is that it’s organisations that work with the administration, are respected by Republicans or that the AI companies listen to. Bipartisan organisati

read the original at LessWrong →
This source publishes only a summary in its feed, so the full article lives at the outlet. The link above and below goes to the original.