LessWrongsafety53m agoenergy 126

Regulate the Deployment, Not Just the Model

image: LessWrong

A who-does-what plan for AI safety, built around Trusted Deployers: certified hosts that keep dangerous models guarded without ending open access. AI has reached a new level of public interest. That may seem like a silly thing to say, as it’s been of interest for a while. But prior (broadly public) interest was about it as a tool, or about the money to be made or lost, or about an effect on jobs. The new interest demands policy. It demands action. The new interest is connected with risks I consider real. Being real doesn’t make these risks certain. But being real, even with uncertainty, is reason enough to act . I’ve written lately about risks, cybersecurity risks, and loss-of-control risks. These tried to explain complex topics, starting from the initial premise. Recommendations follow the explanation. This piece will be a bit different. Its focus is upon what I think we should be doing. You might consider it a policy piece. Policy in a completed form has to be a bit broad. There’s always more than one thing going on. As such, I’ll lay out my outline first, and then offer below the extra detail, background and context that I think is important to understanding each point in that o

read the original at LessWrong →
This source publishes only a summary in its feed, so the full article lives at the outlet. The link above and below goes to the original.